Have a look at a neat nyt shot:
NYT
Image by dominiccampbell
Decent nyt shot
September 9, 2011 By 6 Comments
Comments
Speak Your Mind
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Fresh News & Products
You must be logged in to post a comment.
No.
just wrong to think that everyone who understands that women are fully human are all identical to each other.
I, for one, have long deplored the reverse sexism you list.
I wince at ANYONE being I deplore all violence.
I also strongly feel that sexual stereotypes BOTH sexes, and I argue against them at every For instance, that all women, and only women, are truly compassionate is not only wildly inaccurate (on both counts), but a morally reprehensible position.
There are cold, selfish women; there are warm, compassionate, generous men. Denying both groups exist is delusonal and ethically wrong.
Any time a previously oppressed group fights to end its oppression, a of swing too far in the opposite direction. wrong, but it happens every time (Black supremacists, for instance, who say the majority are ALL racist, because the majority; gays who put down "breeders" is another).
As I say, wrong, but it seems to be nearly universal.
But usually those who want to go back to the previous oppression that scream the loudest, noticed.
Those who want all women to be slaves to men are the ones who spend all their time obsessing over every misandrist comment, made by a minority of self-proclaimed feminists.
Why is THAT?
First of all, read the story. The NYT never said that McCain had an extramarital affair. They that "handlers" were concerned about the relationship and tried to keep her away.
Secondly, McCain is a public figure. Public figures have the same protections against defamation as private people do. In order for him to sue successfully, he would have to prove that what the Times was false, that the Times knew it was false at the time it was published, that the Times published it with gross disregard for the truth, and the Times intended to maliciously harm McCain by the publication. Then McCain would have to prove that harm did, in fact, come from the publication.
There is no way on McCain could meet that standard. He cannot show that each and every person that voted against him in the general election did so only because of this publication.
** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject matter of your question and not legal advice. Local laws or your situation may change the general rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult legal counsel with whom you can discuss all the facts of your case. Answering this question does not indicate an attorney-client relationship. **
Hi Frederic, here are some lassie jokes for you.
What do you call a happy Lassie ? A jolly collie !
What did the cowboy say when the bear ate Lassie? "Well, doggone !"
What do you get when you cross a collie with a trumpet? A Lassie who plays brassie!
Teacher : What is a comet ? Pupil : A star with a tail Teacher: Can you name one ? Pupil: Lassie !
http://foryourinformation.info/jokes/
2002???? Are you kidding – check the STATUTE of LIMITATIONS – they only have 4 years to collect! It would do you no good to pay this – if you check your Credit – already dropped off! (all collections and Bad debts (uncollected) are dropped off after 7 years)
Health Care Reform And The 47 Percent – Forbes -
Limbaugh Interview with Insider,confirms That Had to Give Order>