Basic principles of the US constitution are described
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Six Principles of the US constitution
October 31, 2011 By 11 Comments
Comments
Speak Your Mind
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Fresh News & Products
Basic principles of the US constitution are described
Video Rating: 4 / 5
You must be logged in to post a comment.
my point is you sissy people start making changes to these power happy control freaks before they say you are against the law!
Not only that we are in and un friendly un social socialist globalist regime where where nip tucked in like sardines in a wear-house of isles ready for delivery to the market. One wrong word one mislead person and wham the whole thing blows up with a frenzy of emotions and the next step is the police tanks and more guns men in black opts sniffing your shorts just so we can all go back to our traffic jammed highways we are living in a sick control base of babies n cop callers without a brain!1
NONE of the branches possess any Constitutional POWERS to interpret the Constitution or the laws.
ALL of the branches RIGHTLY possess powers to STRIKE-DOWN parts of the Constitution that are not supported by the the contents of the PREAMBLE. ALL three branches rightly possess the power STRIKE-DOWN any and all laws that do not have some part of the Constitution that justifies the creation of that law.
Constitutional Justification appears in USC Article 6.
@Norie1115 shut the fuck up u dumb bitch and eat a bag of baby dicks
this shit is fucken gay as fuck who ever put this up is a dumb fucken bitch ahahah eat a bag of baby dicks
this is how the USA government should works abcobm
Simple and Clear!! Thank you very much ^ ^
I am having government right now and i don’t understand what the teacher said nor what the textbook is about… this video is very helpful~
I believe you are talking about "bible literalists"…the people refererring to may claim to subscribe to a literal translation of the bible, but clearly something else going on that yields the kind of "bizarre" conclusions about what the bible literally says about the world, about human beings, and about God that you seem to be referencing.
I believe the bible is "literally true"…and to me that means that you use speculation to construct (and even fabricate) answers to questions the bible answer. Doing so is like using the perfectly valid and complete manual for your car to answer questions on your take-home exam in chemistry…how could that be called a "literal" interpretation when the application even valid?
Perhaps we need a new term to identify the sub-group of "bible literalists" talking got it…how about "Bible Onlyists" (note the initials…stinky, stinky)…is that the group you were talking about…the ones that not only take the bible literally, they believe it is the only relevant source for any question a human being might ask? …the ones that say things like, "the bible mention dinosaurs so they must not have existed"?? or "according to the bible, the is 6,000-10,000 years old"??
This site answer the "how much" of your question, but they should help put you in touch with people who can:
http://www.petcareinsurance.com/us/licenses.asp
Vote for this man. He IS the change people yearned for in 2008. Ron Paul 2012!
Hawaii Set to Elect First Vishnu-Worshiping Hindu to United States Congress